_{0}= - 2/f where f is the focal length. One can also replace the parameter b by a dimensionless factor β = b/f. This gives the equation for the hyperbolic surface in a more useful form.

The focal point is then determined to an extremely high degree of precision. I encountered problems with the tool used to plot the ray paths due to an insufficient number of data points. The plot below shows the focal point zoomed a billion times and one still cannot observe any deviation from a point focus.

If my value for β is accurate then the dimensions for the focal region are on the order of 10

^{-15}centimeters which smaller than the diameter of an atom. So the limitations on the precision of the focus seems to depend on how well the lens surface can be shaped and diffraction effects.

I should also point out that I used n = 1 for the index of refraction for the ambient medium and n' = 1.5 for that of the lens. In general the parameter β depends on the two indexes.

## 3 comments:

now is that equation for the len's profile?

Isn't there a mathematical proof that hyperbolic lenses focus collimated light along the axis of the lens perfectly?

Or are you studying something else here? I'm not familiar with the computation involved in ray trace simulation of lenses.

What software did you use to plot the lines and tent your matematical surface of your lens?..

Post a Comment